Despite several failed attempts at national standards in the past,
there was something different about the renewed efforts for national
standards. Governor James B. Hunt, Jr., of North Carolina pulled
together a group of folks in Raleigh, NC, and the talks began. Here
were some obvious factors that made these "behind closed doors" talks of
national standards take off with a renewed momentum:
1.
There was evidence that the state standards varied widely and that many
states appeared to have set low expectations for students. NAEP
provided some evidence to support this with the disparities among
states' scores on the assessments designed by NAEP.
2.
There were large gaps in student performance. This was particularly
evident as the research showed statistically significantly different
lower scores for racial and ethnic minorities who were ready for college
based on studies from ACT.
3. There was also a
growing recognition that state boundaries were becoming irrelevant in
light of an increasing global economy in which American students must
learn to thrive. PISA studies were placing American students far below
those students from countries in which we traded with economically.
Governor
Hunt talks about how serious he realized the problem had become when he
looked at world-wide statistics and economics for our country in
comparison to others.
Personally, I couldn't agree more with
Governor Hunt's assessment of our plight in America, yet when I talk to
other educators and members of the educational professional community,
there seems to be a tendency to become defensive of what we have. And
if you add politics into the mixture, you have yourself a nice little
explosion. How do you all feel about the three statements listed
above?
No comments:
Post a Comment